as seen in the PDF above, have been bureaucratized beyond belief but boil down to:
(a) identification of the 'need' that has not been met by the 'pertinent prior art';
(b) definition of how that need is met in comprehensive basic principles;
(c) detailed disclosure of how best to make and use the invention;
(d) defining the invention claimed and shown in drawings.
Any "new and useful process, machine or manufacture ... or
improvement thereon": id est innovation meriting patent; must
be proved both novel and 'unobvious' in view of the pertinent prior
art: everything preceding in that particular field of invention; during
Examination of the Application in order to obtain Allowance of the same.
The matter is one of perspective: of recognizing the essence of the invention
in the context of what has preceded the innovation; and defining what is new in
terms providing a clear and comprehensive contrast with the pertinent prior art.
This is the burden of the Applicant: the inventor and their representative;
who must disclose fully not only the innovation claimed but also all that
is known to them to have preceded the innovation in that particular field.
patents pending has provided full services before the U.S. Patent Office
following the discipline inherent to the parts, form and content of a full
application allowable by the U.S. Patent Office since 1992 protecting the
rights of inventors with over 50 U.S. Patents with the following tools.
